HIGH COURT
Introduction
The High Court is the highest judicial authority at the state level in India. It functions as the principal court of the state and supervises the entire judicial system within the state.
The High Court acts as the guardian of the Constitution and protector of fundamental rights at the state level. It has both original and appellate jurisdiction, and it exercises control over subordinate courts within its territorial jurisdiction.
The provisions related to High Courts are given in Part VI of the Constitution (Articles 214–231).
Every state in India has a High Court, although two or more states may share a common High Court.
Constitutional Provisions
The Constitution provides detailed provisions regarding High Courts.
| Article | Subject |
| Article 214 | High Courts for states |
| Article 215 | High Court as a court of record |
| Article 216 | Constitution of High Court |
| Article 217 | Appointment of judges |
| Article 218 | Application of provisions of Supreme Court |
| Article 219 | Oath of judges |
| Article 220 | Restriction on practice after retirement |
| Article 221 | Salaries and allowances |
| Article 222 | Transfer of judges |
| Article 223 | Appointment of acting Chief Justice |
| Article 224 | Additional and acting judges |
| Article 225 | Jurisdiction of High Courts |
| Article 226 | Power to issue writs |
| Article 227 | Superintendence over subordinate courts |
| Article 229 | Officers and servants of High Court |
| Article 231 | Common High Court for two or more states |
These articles establish the framework for the organization, powers, and functioning of High Courts.
High Courts for States (Article 214)
Article 214 states that there shall be a High Court for each state.
However, the Constitution allows Parliament to establish a common High Court for two or more states or union territories.
Examples include:
- Punjab and Haryana High Court (shared by Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh)
- Gauhati High Court (earlier served multiple northeastern states).
High Court as a Court of Record (Article 215)
The High Court is a court of record.
This means:
- The records and decisions of the High Court are recognized as legal precedents.
- The High Court has the power to punish for contempt of court.
This power helps maintain the authority and dignity of the judiciary.
Composition of High Court (Article 216)
A High Court consists of:
- Chief Justice
- Other judges as determined by the President.
The number of judges in a High Court is not fixed by the Constitution.
It depends on factors such as:
- workload of the court
- number of pending cases.
Appointment of High Court Judges (Article 217)
Judges of the High Court are appointed by the President of India.
The appointment is made after consultation with:
- Chief Justice of India
- Governor of the concerned state
- Chief Justice of the High Court (for appointment of other judges).
This consultation process is designed to ensure independence of the judiciary.
Collegium System
In practice, the appointment of High Court judges follows the Collegium System.
Under this system:
- a group of senior judges of the Supreme Court recommends appointments and transfers of judges.
The collegium system developed through Supreme Court judgments such as the Second Judges Case (1993) and Third Judges Case (1998).
Qualification of High Court Judges
A person must satisfy the following qualifications to become a judge of a High Court.
- Must be a citizen of India.
- Must have held a judicial office in India for at least 10 years, or
- Must have been an advocate of a High Court for at least 10 years.
The Constitution does not prescribe any minimum age for High Court judges.
Oath of Office (Article 219)
Before entering office, a High Court judge must take an oath before the Governor of the state.
In the oath, the judge promises to:
- uphold the Constitution
- perform duties without fear or favour
- maintain integrity and impartiality.
Salary and Allowances (Article 221)
The salaries of High Court judges are determined by Parliament.
Currently:
- Chief Justice of High Court receives around ₹2.5 lakh per month
- Other judges receive around ₹2.25 lakh per month.
The salaries cannot be reduced during their tenure except during a financial emergency.
Jharkhand High Court
The Jharkhand High Court is the highest judicial authority in the state of Jharkhand.
It was established in 2000 when Jharkhand was carved out of Bihar.
Location
The Jharkhand High Court is located in Ranchi, the capital of the state.
Jurisdiction
The court exercises jurisdiction over the entire state of Jharkhand.
It supervises all subordinate courts in the state.
Importance of Jharkhand High Court
The Jharkhand High Court plays an important role in:
- protection of fundamental rights
- interpretation of laws
- supervision of subordinate courts
- resolving disputes involving state government policies.
The court has also delivered important judgments on issues such as:
- tribal land rights
- mining and environmental regulation
- governance and corruption cases.
Tenure of High Court Judges
The Constitution provides security of tenure to High Court judges to ensure judicial independence.
According to Article 217, a judge of a High Court holds office until the age of 62 years.
This retirement age is lower than that of Supreme Court judges, who retire at 65 years.
The tenure of judges is protected so that they can perform their duties without fear of political pressure.
Vacation of Office
A High Court judge may leave office in the following situations:
- Retirement (upon reaching the age of 62 years)
- Resignation
- Removal by the President
- Appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court
- Transfer to another High Court
Resignation of Judges
A High Court judge may resign from office by submitting a written resignation to the President of India.
The resignation takes effect once it is accepted.
Removal of High Court Judges
High Court judges cannot be removed easily. The Constitution provides a very strict procedure for removal to protect judicial independence.
A judge can only be removed by the President of India on the grounds of:
- proved misbehaviour
- incapacity
The procedure for removal is similar to the removal of Supreme Court judges.
Impeachment Procedure
The removal process involves the following steps:
1. Motion in Parliament
A motion for removal must be introduced in either House of Parliament.
The motion must be supported by:
- at least 100 members of Lok Sabha, or
- 50 members of Rajya Sabha.
2. Investigation Committee
If the motion is admitted, a three-member inquiry committee is formed.
The committee includes:
- a Supreme Court judge
- a Chief Justice of a High Court
- a distinguished jurist.
The committee investigates the allegations against the judge.
3. Voting in Parliament
If the committee finds the judge guilty, the motion is put to vote in Parliament.
The motion must be passed by:
- majority of total membership, and
- two-thirds majority of members present and voting.
4. Removal by President
After Parliament passes the motion, the President issues an order removing the judge.
This process ensures that judges are removed only in serious cases.
Transfer of High Court Judges (Article 222)
The President has the power to transfer a judge from one High Court to another.
The transfer is made after consultation with the Chief Justice of India.
Transfers may be done for administrative reasons or to maintain efficiency in the judiciary.
In practice, the Collegium of the Supreme Court recommends transfers.
Acting Chief Justice (Article 223)
Sometimes the office of the Chief Justice of a High Court becomes vacant due to:
- resignation
- retirement
- absence.
In such situations, the President may appoint one of the judges of the High Court as the Acting Chief Justice.
The Acting Chief Justice performs the duties of the Chief Justice until a new appointment is made.
Additional Judges (Article 224)
The Constitution allows the appointment of additional judges in High Courts.
Additional judges are appointed when:
- there is a temporary increase in workload
- there are large numbers of pending cases.
These judges are appointed for a temporary period (usually up to two years).
Acting Judges
Sometimes a permanent judge may be temporarily unable to perform duties due to illness or other reasons.
In such cases, the President may appoint an acting judge.
Acting judges perform judicial duties for a limited period.
Independence of High Courts
The Constitution provides several safeguards to ensure the independence of High Courts.
Judicial independence is essential for maintaining the rule of law and protecting citizens’ rights.
Security of Tenure
High Court judges cannot be removed easily. The complex impeachment procedure protects them from political pressure.
Fixed Service Conditions
The salaries and allowances of judges are determined by Parliament.
These cannot be reduced during their tenure except during a financial emergency.
Separation from Executive
The judiciary operates independently from the executive branch.
Judges are not subject to control by the government in their judicial functions.
Restriction on Practice After Retirement
According to Article 220, a permanent judge of a High Court cannot practice law in the same High Court after retirement.
However, they may practice in the Supreme Court or other High Courts.
This rule prevents conflicts of interest.
Administrative Control
High Courts have administrative control over subordinate courts within their jurisdiction.
This ensures that the judiciary remains independent from executive interference.
Importance of Judicial Independence
Judicial independence ensures that courts can:
- protect fundamental rights
- resolve disputes impartially
- check misuse of power by government authorities.
Without independence, the judiciary would not be able to perform its constitutional role effectively.
Jharkhand High Court and Judicial Administration
The Jharkhand High Court in Ranchi supervises the functioning of all district and subordinate courts in the state.
It plays an important role in ensuring that justice is delivered fairly and efficiently.
The High Court also addresses important issues related to:
- tribal land disputes
- environmental protection
- corruption and governance.
STATE JUDICIARY
HIGH COURT – JURISDICTION AND POWERS
Introduction
The jurisdiction of a court refers to the authority of the court to hear and decide cases. High Courts in India have a wide range of jurisdiction and powers. They act as the highest judicial authority within the state and supervise the functioning of all subordinate courts.
The jurisdiction of High Courts can broadly be classified into the following categories:
- Original jurisdiction
- Appellate jurisdiction
- Writ jurisdiction
- Supervisory jurisdiction
- Court of Record power
- Control over subordinate courts.
Original Jurisdiction
Original jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear cases for the first time, rather than hearing appeals.
In some matters, individuals can directly approach the High Court without first going to lower courts.
Types of Original Jurisdiction
High Courts exercise original jurisdiction in the following matters.
Enforcement of Fundamental Rights
Citizens can approach the High Court directly for the protection of their fundamental rights.
The High Court can issue writs under Article 226 to enforce these rights.
Civil and Criminal Cases
In certain cases, especially in larger cities, High Courts may directly hear civil and criminal cases.
However, this type of jurisdiction varies among High Courts depending on local laws.
Election Petitions
High Courts have jurisdiction to hear disputes related to elections to the State Legislature.
If a candidate challenges the validity of an election, the case may be filed in the High Court.
Appellate Jurisdiction
Appellate jurisdiction refers to the power of the High Court to hear appeals against decisions of subordinate courts.
High Courts serve as the main appellate courts in the state judicial system.
Types of Appeals
High Courts hear appeals in the following categories.
Civil Appeals
Appeals related to civil disputes such as:
- property disputes
- contract disputes
- family law matters.
If a party is dissatisfied with the judgment of a district court, an appeal can be filed in the High Court.
Criminal Appeals
High Courts hear appeals in criminal cases decided by subordinate courts.
For example:
- appeals against conviction
- appeals against severe punishments.
Appeals in Constitutional Matters
High Courts may hear appeals in cases involving interpretation of laws and constitutional provisions.
Writ Jurisdiction (Article 226)
One of the most important powers of High Courts is the power to issue writs under Article 226.
This power enables High Courts to protect:
- fundamental rights
- other legal rights of citizens.
Types of Writs
The High Court can issue five types of writs.
Habeas Corpus
Habeas Corpus means “to produce the body.”
This writ is issued to release a person who has been illegally detained.
The court orders the authority holding the person to produce him before the court.
Mandamus
Mandamus means “we command.”
This writ is issued to direct a public authority to perform a duty that it has failed to perform.
Prohibition
The writ of Prohibition is issued by a higher court to prevent a lower court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction.
Certiorari
Certiorari is issued to quash the decision of a lower court or tribunal if it acted without jurisdiction or violated principles of natural justice.
Quo Warranto
Quo Warranto means “by what authority.”
This writ is issued to question the legality of a person holding a public office.
If the court finds that the appointment is illegal, it may remove the person from office.
Difference Between Article 226 and Article 32
The writ jurisdiction of High Courts under Article 226 is wider than that of the Supreme Court under Article 32.
| Feature | Article 226 | Article 32 |
| Court | High Court | Supreme Court |
| Purpose | Fundamental and legal rights | Fundamental rights only |
| Scope | Wider | Narrower |
Thus, High Courts have greater flexibility in granting relief to citizens.
Supervisory Jurisdiction (Article 227)
Under Article 227, High Courts have the power of superintendence over all subordinate courts and tribunals within their territorial jurisdiction.
This power allows High Courts to ensure that lower courts function properly and follow the law.
Functions under Supervisory Jurisdiction
High Courts may:
- call for records of subordinate courts
- issue directions to lower courts
- ensure proper administration of justice.
This power strengthens the hierarchical structure of the judiciary.
Court of Record (Article 215)
As a court of record, the High Court has two important powers.
Power to Punish for Contempt
The High Court can punish individuals for contempt of court if they:
- disobey court orders
- insult the authority of the court.
Legal Precedents
The judgments of the High Court are recorded and serve as precedents for subordinate courts.
Lower courts must follow these precedents.
Control over Subordinate Courts (Article 235)
High Courts exercise administrative control over subordinate courts in the state.
This includes control over:
- district courts
- subordinate judges
- judicial magistrates.
The High Court may also supervise the appointment, promotion, and discipline of judicial officers.
Jurisdiction of Jharkhand High Court
The Jharkhand High Court exercises jurisdiction over the entire state.
It hears cases related to:
- civil disputes
- criminal matters
- constitutional issues.
The court also supervises district courts across Jharkhand.
Because Jharkhand has many tribal regions and mining-related disputes, the High Court frequently handles cases involving:
- tribal land rights
- environmental protection
- mining regulations.
Importance of High Court Jurisdiction
The wide jurisdiction of High Courts ensures that:
- justice is accessible to citizens
- lower courts remain accountable
- government authorities follow the law.
Through its jurisdiction, the High Court protects constitutional values and maintains the rule of law.
STATE JUDICIARY
HIGH COURT – JURISDICTION AND POWERS
Introduction
The jurisdiction of a court refers to the authority of the court to hear and decide cases. High Courts in India have a wide range of jurisdiction and powers. They act as the highest judicial authority within the state and supervise the functioning of all subordinate courts.
The jurisdiction of High Courts can broadly be classified into the following categories:
- Original jurisdiction
- Appellate jurisdiction
- Writ jurisdiction
- Supervisory jurisdiction
- Court of Record power
- Control over subordinate courts.
Original Jurisdiction
Original jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear cases for the first time, rather than hearing appeals.
In some matters, individuals can directly approach the High Court without first going to lower courts.
Types of Original Jurisdiction
High Courts exercise original jurisdiction in the following matters.
Enforcement of Fundamental Rights
Citizens can approach the High Court directly for the protection of their fundamental rights.
The High Court can issue writs under Article 226 to enforce these rights.
Civil and Criminal Cases
In certain cases, especially in larger cities, High Courts may directly hear civil and criminal cases.
However, this type of jurisdiction varies among High Courts depending on local laws.
Election Petitions
High Courts have jurisdiction to hear disputes related to elections to the State Legislature.
If a candidate challenges the validity of an election, the case may be filed in the High Court.
Appellate Jurisdiction
Appellate jurisdiction refers to the power of the High Court to hear appeals against decisions of subordinate courts.
High Courts serve as the main appellate courts in the state judicial system.
Types of Appeals
High Courts hear appeals in the following categories.
Civil Appeals
Appeals related to civil disputes such as:
- property disputes
- contract disputes
- family law matters.
If a party is dissatisfied with the judgment of a district court, an appeal can be filed in the High Court.
Criminal Appeals
High Courts hear appeals in criminal cases decided by subordinate courts.
For example:
- appeals against conviction
- appeals against severe punishments.
Appeals in Constitutional Matters
High Courts may hear appeals in cases involving interpretation of laws and constitutional provisions.
Writ Jurisdiction (Article 226)
One of the most important powers of High Courts is the power to issue writs under Article 226.
This power enables High Courts to protect:
- fundamental rights
- other legal rights of citizens.
Types of Writs
The High Court can issue five types of writs.
Habeas Corpus
Habeas Corpus means “to produce the body.”
This writ is issued to release a person who has been illegally detained.
The court orders the authority holding the person to produce him before the court.
Mandamus
Mandamus means “we command.”
This writ is issued to direct a public authority to perform a duty that it has failed to perform.
Prohibition
The writ of Prohibition is issued by a higher court to prevent a lower court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction.
Certiorari
Certiorari is issued to quash the decision of a lower court or tribunal if it acted without jurisdiction or violated principles of natural justice.
Quo Warranto
Quo Warranto means “by what authority.”
This writ is issued to question the legality of a person holding a public office.
If the court finds that the appointment is illegal, it may remove the person from office.
Difference Between Article 226 and Article 32
The writ jurisdiction of High Courts under Article 226 is wider than that of the Supreme Court under Article 32.
| Feature | Article 226 | Article 32 |
| Court | High Court | Supreme Court |
| Purpose | Fundamental and legal rights | Fundamental rights only |
| Scope | Wider | Narrower |
Thus, High Courts have greater flexibility in granting relief to citizens.
Supervisory Jurisdiction (Article 227)
Under Article 227, High Courts have the power of superintendence over all subordinate courts and tribunals within their territorial jurisdiction.
This power allows High Courts to ensure that lower courts function properly and follow the law.
Functions under Supervisory Jurisdiction
High Courts may:
- call for records of subordinate courts
- issue directions to lower courts
- ensure proper administration of justice.
This power strengthens the hierarchical structure of the judiciary.
Court of Record (Article 215)
As a court of record, the High Court has two important powers.
Power to Punish for Contempt
The High Court can punish individuals for contempt of court if they:
- disobey court orders
- insult the authority of the court.
Legal Precedents
The judgments of the High Court are recorded and serve as precedents for subordinate courts.
Lower courts must follow these precedents.
Control over Subordinate Courts (Article 235)
High Courts exercise administrative control over subordinate courts in the state.
This includes control over:
- district courts
- subordinate judges
- judicial magistrates.
The High Court may also supervise the appointment, promotion, and discipline of judicial officers.
Jurisdiction of Jharkhand High Court
The Jharkhand High Court exercises jurisdiction over the entire state.
It hears cases related to:
- civil disputes
- criminal matters
- constitutional issues.
The court also supervises district courts across Jharkhand.
Because Jharkhand has many tribal regions and mining-related disputes, the High Court frequently handles cases involving:
- tribal land rights
- environmental protection
- mining regulations.
Importance of High Court Jurisdiction
The wide jurisdiction of High Courts ensures that:
- justice is accessible to citizens
- lower courts remain accountable
- government authorities follow the law.
Through its jurisdiction, the High Court protects constitutional values and maintains the rule of law.
Conclusion
The High Court occupies a central position in the judicial system of India. Its wide jurisdiction and powers allow it to safeguard the rights of citizens and maintain judicial oversight over subordinate courts.
The High Court’s authority to issue writs, hear appeals, and supervise lower courts ensures that justice is delivered effectively at the state level.
HIGH COURT – CONTROL OVER SUBORDINATE COURTS AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM
Introduction
The High Court is the highest judicial authority in the state. Apart from deciding cases, it also supervises the functioning of subordinate courts within the state.
This supervisory role ensures that the entire judicial system functions efficiently and that justice is administered according to the law.
The Constitution gives High Courts several powers to maintain control over lower courts.
Control of High Court over Subordinate Courts
The High Court exercises control over subordinate courts under Articles 227 and 235 of the Constitution.
These provisions ensure that the judicial system at the state level remains independent and efficient.
Article 227 – Superintendence over Subordinate Courts
Under Article 227, the High Court has the power of superintendence over all courts and tribunals within its territorial jurisdiction.
This means that the High Court can supervise the functioning of lower courts.
Powers under Article 227
The High Court may:
- call for records of cases from subordinate courts
- issue directions to lower courts
- ensure proper administration of justice
- correct errors committed by subordinate courts.
This supervisory power ensures that lower courts follow legal procedures and maintain fairness in judicial proceedings.
Article 235 – Control over Subordinate Judiciary
Article 235 gives High Courts administrative control over the subordinate judiciary.
This includes control over:
- district judges
- subordinate judges
- judicial magistrates.
The High Court plays a major role in matters related to:
- posting and promotion of judges
- disciplinary actions
- transfers within the judicial service.
Structure of Subordinate Courts
The subordinate judiciary forms the lower level of the judicial system in a state.
These courts deal with the majority of civil and criminal cases.
The structure of subordinate courts is generally organized in the following hierarchy.
District Courts
At the top of the subordinate judiciary are District Courts.
Each district usually has a District and Sessions Court.
Civil Jurisdiction
The District Court hears civil cases such as:
- property disputes
- contract disputes
- family law cases.
Criminal Jurisdiction
The Sessions Court hears serious criminal cases including:
- murder
- robbery
- other serious offences.
Subordinate Civil Courts
Below the district courts are civil courts such as:
- civil judge (senior division)
- civil judge (junior division).
These courts handle smaller civil disputes.
Magistrate Courts
Magistrate courts handle criminal cases.
There are different types of magistrates such as:
- Chief Judicial Magistrate
- Judicial Magistrate First Class
- Judicial Magistrate Second Class.
Subordinate Judiciary in Jharkhand
The Jharkhand High Court supervises the entire judicial system within the state.
District courts are located in various districts such as:
- Ranchi
- Dhanbad
- Jamshedpur (East Singhbhum)
- Bokaro
- Hazaribagh
- Dumka.
These district courts deal with civil and criminal cases arising in their respective districts.
Role of High Court in Judicial Administration
The High Court performs several administrative functions related to subordinate courts.
These include:
- appointment of district judges (in consultation with the Governor and State Public Service Commission)
- inspection of subordinate courts
- training and guidance of judicial officers.
Through these functions, the High Court ensures the smooth functioning of the judicial system.
Comparison between Supreme Court and High Court
Although both courts are important parts of the Indian judiciary, there are several differences between them.
| Feature | Supreme Court | High Court |
| Level | National court | State-level court |
| Jurisdiction | Entire country | Particular state |
| Appointment | President appoints judges | President appoints judges |
| Retirement age | 65 years | 62 years |
| Writ jurisdiction | Article 32 | Article 226 |
The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in India, while High Courts function as the highest courts within their respective states.
Importance of High Courts
High Courts play a crucial role in the Indian judicial system.
Protection of Fundamental Rights
Through writ jurisdiction, High Courts protect the fundamental rights of citizens.
Supervision of Subordinate Courts
High Courts supervise lower courts and ensure proper administration of justice.
Constitutional Interpretation
High Courts interpret laws and constitutional provisions in cases brought before them.
Judicial Review
High Courts have the power of judicial review, meaning they can declare laws unconstitutional if they violate the Constitution.
Challenges Faced by High Courts
Despite their important role, High Courts face several challenges.
Pendency of Cases
A large number of cases remain pending in High Courts.
This delays justice for many citizens.
Shortage of Judges
Many High Courts face a shortage of judges, which increases the workload of existing judges.
Infrastructure Issues
Some courts lack adequate infrastructure and technological facilities.
Judicial Reforms
Several reforms have been proposed to improve the efficiency of the judiciary.
Increasing the Number of Judges
Increasing the number of judges can help reduce the backlog of cases.
Use of Technology
Digital courts and e-filing systems can speed up judicial processes.
Strengthening Subordinate Courts
Improving infrastructure and training for subordinate courts can enhance the overall efficiency of the judicial system.
Conclusion
The High Court is a key institution in the Indian judicial system. It acts as the highest court at the state level and ensures that justice is delivered fairly and efficiently. Through its powers of supervision, appellate jurisdiction, and judicial review, the High Court maintains the rule of law within the state.
In Jharkhand, the High Court plays an especially important role in addressing legal issues related to governance, tribal rights, land disputes, and environmental protection.
The continued strengthening of High Courts and subordinate courts is essential for ensuring effective justice delivery and upholding constitutional values.
For Better Preparation of Prelims & Mains Exam for Jharkhand Section
you can get this book: